https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94473
--- Comment #62 from HuangRan <huang...@iscas.ac.cn> ---
(In reply to HuangRan from comment #61)
> Hi Kevin,
>
> I have not gotten time to go through this discussion. But in my opinion, I
> fully support your point to remove legacy code(VBE, device table...) because
> those modules are also not used anymore in modern Intel/AMD open source
> driver. Also, using I2C to detect EDID information is the trend which
> replaces the fixed table method.
> Making some code in regression in this process is normal. We just need
> record which commit id is working and let users(like me) to know that or as
> Benno said, we can use a branch to do that before committing to master. By
> this way, the users can still get correct working driver which will make
> them happy to go with the new driver.
>
> Thanks,
I went through the discussion and it seems XvMC and VBE are the modules which
make unichrome.sf.net and openchrome.org difference at that time and then bring
more dicussion about those two projects. And finally openchrome.org wins and be
merged into X.org. So that can explain why XvMC and VBE are still there in
current OpenChrome DDX code.
Thanks,
Frank
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Openchrome-devel mailing list
Openchrome-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openchrome-devel
