On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:47:31AM +0100, Stefan Scheffler wrote: > hmm no ..doesn't help here.
Yeah, I know. As i just wrote in another mail, the problem appeared again :( > > OTOH you could disable acceleration with NoAccel. That works as well, > > but the overall performance sucks after this. > > > > yeah.. that seems to work but is unusable. thanks anyway Yep. It is really unusable, because its not just "unaccelerated" but _extremeley_ slow. If I move a window from a to b it takes some seconds (!!) which it certainly shouldn't. > I tried disabling certain acceleration features already, but it didn't > really improve things. Other than slowing everything down. I don't > really know anything about graphics hardware though, so most were just > shots in the dark. Me either. I even tried to do the opposite by using the experimental accelerator, but that didn't make it better either. > I'm not really sure if this really has something todo with accell, > because if I start X first with unichrome then with openchrome it's > working correctly too. Eh. Thats sounds very much like coincidence, because I don't see any relation between the different starts of X. But I can't test this anyway because unichrome driver does not know about my display/chipset combination. Best Regards, Patrick _______________________________________________ openchrome-users mailing list [email protected] http://wiki.openchrome.org/mailman/listinfo/openchrome-users Main page: http://www.openchrome.org Wiki: http://wiki.openchrome.org User Forum: http://wiki.openchrome.org/tikiwiki/tiki-view_forum.php?forumId=1
