Hi, On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 03:52:10PM -0500, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > Forest Bond wrote: >> There's also this: >> http://www.alittletooquiet.net/text/a-license-for-the-via-vt6656-linux-driver/ >> In other words, VIA publishes the source for *some* drivers, and publishes >> reasonable licenses for only some of those. > > That's interesting. It looks as though the source they're publishing comes > with no LICENSE file. But browsing the CVS tree from unichrome it looks > like it's got the same issue ... But I see your point. So it's as if one > can distribute the files one by one, but not the actual tarball ... weird > :/
No, the individual files do not contain licenses either They refer to a license that is not included. None of the driver source can be legally redistributed. -Forest -- Forest Bond http://www.alittletooquiet.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ openchrome-users mailing list [email protected] http://wiki.openchrome.org/mailman/listinfo/openchrome-users Main page: http://www.openchrome.org Wiki: http://wiki.openchrome.org User Forum: http://wiki.openchrome.org/tikiwiki/tiki-view_forum.php?forumId=1
