> If EnableAGPDMA were switched off by default for chips that seem to > have problems with it, would that take away your objection (and > would probably make the Gentoo developer happier also)?
In my opinion it is the best thing that we can do until the bug will be really fixed. As far as I know, the main reason why openchrome driver didn't hit Gentoo portage tree earlier is that openChrome project didn't make any releases or release candidates till the 0.2.900 version. Now when the situation has changed the way is open. I'll point Steve to this discussion, maybe he has something to add. > Agreed. But at the moment there are only three developers who can > really do development, who have the skills and the data sheets: > Gabriel, John, and Ivor. And all three of them are doing other > things most of the time. Also: when they don't own the hardware > that is affected by one of the major bugs, there is little they can > do. Remote testing is exasperating and thus virtually impossible. Thank you for explanation, I certainly understand your point. And as I said I appreciate openchrome team efforts very much. _______________________________________________ openchrome-users mailing list [email protected] http://wiki.openchrome.org/mailman/listinfo/openchrome-users Main page: http://www.openchrome.org Wiki: http://wiki.openchrome.org User Forum: http://wiki.openchrome.org/tikiwiki/tiki-view_forum.php?forumId=1
