On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 08:50:18PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:16:36PM -0300, Mario Rugiero wrote: > > I'm not sure. To talk about the path I think I should know the algorithm > > used. The thing is that flash uses your CPU only, so all the processing > > consumes CPU cycles, mplayer, since it uses xv, uses the GPU for some > > operations, thus using less CPU cycles than flash. The algorithm used can > > actually be the same, mplayer could be even more resource consuming > > overall, but it uses less CPU because its process is done elsewhere, that's > > what I mean. > > I've seen that the destination lines of my test go to the AGP addresses, > 0xb0000000. > > I've also tried x11perf -shmput500, which may be similar to what flashplayer > uses. I get a maximum of 53/s; What do you get, in K8M800/K8N800? > > If flash takes 50% of the cpu, may be at the limit for 25fps with the 50% > left.. > > I've tested a slightly newer notebook, with an Intel controller, and 'x11perf > -shmput500' gives 1150/s, which is about 20 times more... Shouldn't the > unichrome chip do more than 53/s? >
Ah, Mario, remember that my system shows 50% of usage of flash, 50% of usage of X. The usage of X is in that backtrace I pasted at the first post. I don't try to fix the 50% of usage of flash, but that of X. _______________________________________________ openchrome-users mailing list openchrome-users@openchrome.org http://wiki.openchrome.org/mailman/listinfo/openchrome-users Main page: http://www.openchrome.org Wiki: http://wiki.openchrome.org User Forum: http://wiki.openchrome.org/tikiwiki/tiki-view_forum.php?forumId=1
