On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Gustavo Machado Campagnani Gama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Joel, > > I like your proposal in general. Just but I have two caveats: 1. I have > a feeling that we will eventually end up with a few cases where the name > will be too long and unfriendly (getHandleSetByTypeOrTargetOrName...); > 2. it'll make porting code from other novamente-derived trees a lot > harder.
For those few very generic forms, then leaving them as getHandleSet would probably be the best idea. Only those that are more specialised would indicate as such in their name. What should we use for keep tracking of specific tasks (rather than generic ideas/projects) to be done at some indeterminate point in the future? I see we don't have a TODO file yet, but there is a section in README (am I correct in assuming the only item there, referring to cxxtest and cmake, has already been done?)... or perhaps we should use Launchpad bugs for these? J _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~opencog-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/people/+me/+editemails More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
