On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Gustavo Machado Campagnani Gama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, just as side joke, here's the *real* reason I have so many dead > branches on my launchpad workspace: the fabulous people from Canonical > decided to *remove* the option to delete a branch in Launchpad 2.0 (!!). > About a month ago I spent at least a couple of hours trying to figure > out how to do it -- until I gave up. There's probably an obscure and > undocumented way to do it so, if anyone finds out, please let me know.
1. follow the link for a branch from code.launchpad.net 2. there is a little red negative sign next to the branch name/description for deletion... assuming you've got permissions to do so! > >From the other replies, there seems to be a general consensus that we > need an unstable branch. So here's a proposal: after I land the 'dynamic > modules' branch (which is a fairly large patch) and the .deb packages, > I'll rebase it again against the latest changes from Linas and -- > preferably after others test and review it -- I'll publish it as > 'unstable' (or whatever you'd like to call it) under the '~opencog-dev' > workspace. > > Then, we merge it back to 'main' whenever people feel that the current > tree is stable enough. With this model, people have the option of > branching from main for local experiments and the burden of keeping it > up to date shouldn't be too large as main won't change so often. > > What do y'all think? Sounds good to me! J _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~opencog-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~opencog-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
