Yes, there are not yet any systematic hands-on tutorials, sorry...

OpenCog is not just a toolkit or framework.   However, it can
certainly be used that way, and has profitably been used that way
sometimes.

If you look at "Engineering General Intelligence", especially volume
2, you will find a comprehensive cognitive architecture aimed at
human-level AGI.   The current OpenCog system implements parts of this
design, and also includes some other stuff....  However, the whole
integrated design as described in that book is not yet ready and
usable... only some pieces are there....  So for now, you can use
those existing pieces for something, or you can work on trying to
complete that whole design .. or you can add new stuff out of your own
head ;) ...

In the overall cognitive architecture, PLN can be used in many ways...
it can be used to help figure out how to achieve system goals, but
also for many other kinds of inference...

If you want to work on using OPenCog to control an autonomous agent,
then one option is to join our effort to make OpenCog control the
Hanson Robot heads (and the avatar model thereof that exists in
Blender) ....  This is the only current initiative to try to use
OpenCog as an integrated cognitive architecture rather than a
toolkit/framework..

-- Ben G

On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Apil Tamang
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Been reading through the PLN book, largely because I really couldn't get
> hands-on on any examples or tutorials exploring various concepts of opencog
> in a more streamlined way. I am starting to get the impression that much of
> opencog is really just a framework for doing advanced machine learning work.
> Let me know how true that is.
>
> Not really griping here either. PLN has been a good read. A good insight to
> have at this point is how PLN is relevant to the opencog framework. This
> might help me understand how PLN is used in a more practical context. The
> wiki page gives a little, it is far from what I'd call a satisfactory
> exposition. Where is the integration between concepts form PLN and Opencog
> itself ? Does PLN really just extend opencog, for that matter?
>
> Thanks for any feedback.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "opencog" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/3fab4600-16aa-47e6-98ed-a7aab243eb0a%40googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Ben Goertzel, PhD
http://goertzel.org

“I tell my students, when you go to these meetings, see what direction
everyone is headed, so you can go in the opposite direction. Don’t
polish the brass on the bandwagon.” – V. S. Ramachandran

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBdyodo4pknv%3DbHK26cnF0-zjF2kckt81q9%3Dt%2BBco%2BGhwQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to