I believe it's an instance node, which we'd normally write as PredicateNode "mi'arpe'u_123"
or some such... On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:58 PM, 'Nil Geisweiller' via opencog <[email protected]> wrote: > Just read http://wiki.opencog.org/w/Link_Parse_to_Logic_via_Lojban the > proposal looks awesome to me. > > Just curious, where the prefix gibberish of node names such as > > PredicateNode (stv 1.0 0.0) "nMtuPfmIJBTgtPV),5on___mi'arpe'u" > > come from? > > Also it occurs to me that the pattern miner can be seen as a big ass PLN > rule, and thus should be callable by the BC (or an adequately customized > version of it), as opposed to be solely used in conjunction with the FC as > described. > > Nil > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "opencog" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/4bbdb5aa-c2b6-1791-bb2a-425180c6de9b%40gmail.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Ben Goertzel, PhD http://goertzel.org “I tell my students, when you go to these meetings, see what direction everyone is headed, so you can go in the opposite direction. Don’t polish the brass on the bandwagon.” – V. S. Ramachandran -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBf3YLutKQ0fqfyj8gyD8KqLv3PE4nsKD_gND3wcAPob0g%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
