thx, it's on my reading list!

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Linas Vepstas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Oops I forgot the URL
>
> http://iml.univ-mrs.fr/~girard/0.pdf   its from 2001
>
> I suspect that there are later, more approachable/readable intros to
> the topic from other authors. The wikipedia coverage sucks, though.
>
> --linas
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Linas Vepstas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Kind-of off-topic, and I've read only about 5 pages so far, but:
>>
>> Girard introduces the concept of "Loci" (kind-of-like memory pointers)
>> in Locus Solum whose subtitle is "from the rules of logic to the logic
>> of rules".
>>
>> Insofar was PLN is about rules that capture logic, and the URE is
>> something that applies rules, its worth understanding what kind of
>> logic applies to the URE itself.  I think Girard has a partial answer
>> to this, unfortunately, its not written at an easy-to-grasp level.
>>
>> --linas
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 2:33 AM, Ben Goertzel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Some discussion on whether inference trails are needed or not occurred
>>> on the Open-NARS email list .. pasting one of my mails here as it
>>> seems relevant...
>>>
>>>
>>> ***
>>> Although -- we still do have inference trails in PLN, and we also
>>> sometimes go beyond that and use an auxiliary Atomspace to store the
>>> whole inference digraph that gave rise to a given truth-value
>>> update... (in which case revision can make a better stab at using
>>> inference history to account for dependencies)
>>>
>>> So unfortunately I think the answer is that sometimes trails (or more
>>> complex inference history structures) are what you want, whereas other
>>> times you can do without them and let the circular multiple-counting
>>> of evidence kinda come out in the wash...
>>>
>>> Crudely, I feel that large-scale low-accuracy inference ---- like in
>>> perception processing, or "unconscious" episodic memory recollection,
>>> etc. --- can get by with the "comes out in the wash" approach ...
>>> whereas focused precise deliberative reasoning has got to use trails
>>> or something more sophisticated
>>>
>>> I would conjecture that the brain's trail-like mechanisms exist via
>>> the cortex-hippocampus interface, and thus are only invoked for
>>> inferences where working memory plays a major role ... not for the
>>> vast mass of "long-term memory only" background "unconscious"
>>> inferences..
>>>
>>> -- Ben
>>> ***
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ben Goertzel, PhD
>>> http://goertzel.org
>>>
>>> “I tell my students, when you go to these meetings, see what direction
>>> everyone is headed, so you can go in the opposite direction. Don’t
>>> polish the brass on the bandwagon.” – V. S. Ramachandran
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "opencog" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBc2PzT_WA0J%2Bbr8dQ4zcsTpbKv%3Dy3%3DVY56XUi29bBKZ2w%40mail.gmail.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "opencog" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAHrUA35L0ZNPLPVhjXVC99GsRyuS3P%3D87MLhLhgabXw0PJOXmQ%40mail.gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Ben Goertzel, PhD
http://goertzel.org

“I tell my students, when you go to these meetings, see what direction
everyone is headed, so you can go in the opposite direction. Don’t
polish the brass on the bandwagon.” – V. S. Ramachandran

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBchzsENkPTRxZ3ADecpWwHH-KZ0Uk1WK8DuJwNfoQ8Hsg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to