On 12/18/2016 06:38 AM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
I have posted my design idea (discussed in a recent email thread) on
the wiki site here
The Backward Chainer can also be framed that way. :-) Even more so
directly than what you've sketched on the SampleLink page.
The BC as currently implemented evolves atomese programs, where each
program encodes a specific forward chaining strategies (FCS for short).
There is a difficulty though, there are no easy way to evaluate the
fitness of a FCS, either it proves the target or it doesn't. Or let's
say that the fitness landscape is extremely chaotic, some FCS may prove
nothing at all, while a tiny variation of it may prove our target
BUT this can be overcome by meta-learning, i.e. learning a measure of
success for FCS that are half-way there. So in this framework
meta-learning would be used to reshape the fitness function, from a
crisp chaotic one to a smooth regular one.
so it doesn't get lost
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.