On 06/01/2017 08:30 PM, rocketpwr.com wrote:
"however you're workaround might speed up subsequent loading. How
faster
is it once already compiled? "
scheme@(guile-user)> ,t (load-from-path "loadConceptnet4.scm")
compiled splits/cnet4.1.scm
compiled splits/cnet4.2.scm
compiled splits/cnet4.3.scm
[...redacted loading files 4-58...]
compiled splits/cnet4.59.scm
compiled splits/cnet4.60.scm
compiled splits/cnet4.61.scm
;; 13.424310s real time, 13.906361s run time. 1.137787s spent in GC.
That seems pretty good. Do you know how that compares to using
--no-auto-compile
in the first place?
Thanks,
Nil
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/e6de7f7a-be7c-488a-8d00-ad559dac76c2%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/e6de7f7a-be7c-488a-8d00-ad559dac76c2%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/9f6c5541-e548-6a1c-eb97-fbeb3de7e111%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
