On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Linas Vepstas <[email protected]> wrote: > So same here: the disjuncts are the flattened parts of a pattern. you can > glue them together to get the whole complex pattern, but by working with the > flattened pieces, everything becomes much much simpler. So your word-tuples > are undoubtedly non-linear: and that is the point: don't work with > word-tuples. They are a difficult, bad representation.
Yes, that much is very clear ... one big advantage of our approach is that we're NOT just acting on word tuples and doing statistics; we're alternating steps of -- forming parse trees -- gathering statistics based on abstractions from these parse trees ... ben -- Ben Goertzel, PhD http://goertzel.org "I am God! I am nothing, I'm play, I am freedom, I am life. I am the boundary, I am the peak." -- Alexander Scriabin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBe11ZK-PHtL5Md1Cyhxawg4bohJs%3DygJdnPyOmixSVy4w%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
