On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Dmitry Ponyatov <[email protected]>
wrote:

> no.  why would you think it did?
>>
>
> Hypergraph rewrite model looks native for source code processing and
> analisys
>
> That is true, but the people who need that already have it ... so there
are graph rewrite engines in gcc, in llvm/clang, in guile, and I assume in
java and in perl and probably many other languages and compilers.

I tried to lift some of the general generic ideas from compiler design, and
stick them into atomese, but atomese is kind-of much too fat and too slow
for use in any ordinary compiler or code analysis tool. Its really meant
for probabilistic knowledge representation.

Now, maybe you could do a supercompiler in opencog, but ven then it would
be more efficient to create some custom hand-tuned code for that.

--linas

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAHrUA34r_LGqObvqjuMnrzwt7Z1%3DxF%3DE4GfsvH1kbT%3DtMwOmcQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to