openpsi , in opencog, serves  a similar role to BDI  ...

On Jul 31, 2017 12:47 PM, "Alex" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have heard about Eva chatbot. So - the question is - are there some
> ongoing efforts to build BDI (Belief-Desires-Intentions and maybe +
> synthetic emtions) agent in OpenCog? There are MindAgents and several other
> agents but I guess that those "agents" are specialised maintenance threads
> that updates PLN probability, recency and importance values and those
> MindAgents are not BDI agents.
>
> My domain problem is code generation from the norms and commonsense
> knoweldge. And I see that I need two approaches for solving this:
> 1)* inference control is the narrow approach* - which premises to select
> for inference, which proof startegy to choose (in terms of Coq or
> Isabelle/HOL proof assitants) and so on. Inference control is more or less
> about small step inference.
> 2) activity of BDI agent: I need to formulate goals of my code generation
> and I need to ignite agent process that inferes subgoals for my goals, and
> further that decomposes those subgoals in activities and that in turn
> executes activities, monitors how the subgoals and goals are achieved and
> takes appropriate corrective actions. Appartenly - this is* large step
> inference control*. As far as I understand the state of the art, then BDI
> agents (or autonomous agents in general) are the processes what exactly do
> such kind of work - selects goals, subgoals, activities and executes them.
>
> So - it is crucial to have BDI agent. I have (very small, but growing,
> including automatically from the natural language texts) knowledge base in
> OpenCog but I need agent activities that make directed inference and
> creates desired artifacts.* So - are there implementation of BDI agents
> in OpenCog or maybe there are external BDI agents that can process the
> OpenCog.*
>
> There are two interesting points additionaly:
> 1) as far as I have checked other cognitive architectures then my guess
> that building the agent is their primary goal, i.e. these platforms are
> made in the form of agents.
> 2) of course, there is ongoing debate - should be build seed of AGI (e.g.
> in the form of OpenCog BDI agent) or can we wait that OpenCog knowledge
> base grows so large, sophisticated and fine that BDI agent (and very
> capable one) emerges from it. So - there is no need for seed. This may
> partially explain the situation if there is no ready BDI agent in OpenCog.
>
> *However - I feel that some agent there should be - how Eva chatbot can
> work if it is not agent? *
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "opencog" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/opencog/5e6e0c68-ed83-4494-96e6-a1c6c1659294%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/5e6e0c68-ed83-4494-96e6-a1c6c1659294%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBdJh5yePXyQbzzLsUcTy6wjdJp8t4K5xZfKshsrQnBtYg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to