> I think the abstract part of OpenPsi, provisionally called OCD, should be > clearly taken away and put in another directory. If it's abstract enough it > could even live in the AtomSpace repo. That would be convenient as the URE > needs such a decision code. >
Yes. Last I tried to work with it, it had some very awkward corners (the "demands" part was badly integrated), yet other parts were clean and well-designed/coded. It was certainly abstract enough to be a part of the atomspace. However, untangling the tangled bits from the clean bits might be quite hard/time-consuming. --linas -- cassette tapes - analog TV - film cameras - you -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAHrUA34E%3DFXXibZVUWOOamf5BDezYc34DtKf0MCGQeijXwPEZQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
