Alexey,

***
Our knowledge is built from data. Deduction systems (probabilistic or
not) lack this connection, while functional PPLs are well-suited for
this.
***

I don't understand why you think this way...

The semantics of probabilistic logic systems can be naturally framed
in a fully observation-based way, which is what the original PLN book
is about...

It's true that a logic system, as part of its formulation, makes some
commitments about the initial logic rules, which are not initially
derived from the data but rather supplied by the system designer

OTOH a probabilistic programming system, as part of its formulation,
makes some commitments about the initial programming language
primitives, which are not initially derived from the data but rather
supplied by the system designer

And then there are well known mathematical mappings btw assumptions
about logic rules, and assumptions about programming language
primitives

So why do you think the latter are more suited for being built from data?

>From my view it's intuitively sort of the opposite -- I have  very
detailed picture of how the semantics of PLN is built up from a
system's observations, whereas I don't have such a detailed picture of
how a functional PPL's semantics is built up from observations.   OTOH
from a math rather than intuitive perspective I can see it's all the
same shit...

-- Ben



On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 8:02 PM, Alexey Potapov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The difference between a theorem proving
>> based AI and a program learning based AI is merely an “implementation
>> detail” ;-) …
>
>
> Well, true, but the devil is in the implementation detail.



-- 
Ben Goertzel, PhD
http://goertzel.org

"Only those who will risk going too far can possibly find out how far
they can go." - T.S. Eliot

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBf9_TKnpE%3DTPgCo3nWC5N_riZmWk%2Bh1G5%3DT7KLbRkrciQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to