Am Montag, 2. März 2020 16:55:02 UTC schrieb linas: > > Ah! > -- So, if you just need a motion planner that works (as opposed to messing > with the theory of it) then, as a practical solution, I would recommend > just grabbing something off the shelf and wiring it in, ad hoc. >
Yes, I'm aware of ASP (and several other approaches) that do specific things very fast. But most of them can't handle uncertainty or can't handle variables, both of which we make use of in this project (e.g. robot perception and its interpretation of human behaviour introducing uncertainty)..and I'm not looking for a solution where I have to keep around *n* knowledge bases to make *n* different software packages happy just because they tend to be excellent at a specific niche. (I already have to integrate too many for comfort) If path planning turns out to be too slow, I'd rather apply some abstraction (from waypoints to hubs and spokes). What I'd also like to try is some 'smart' (in the smartphone sense) chaining, where we try to evaluate the easy parts first and use those to constrain the harder parts, and where we allow for more finely-grained scoping (e.g. "only dogs qualify for this variable, we only have two dogs, don't consider 500 waypoints here"). Best, Alex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/9a695663-1243-4848-8103-6832c358536b%40googlegroups.com.
