On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 12:47 PM Amirouche Boubekki <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry! I do not want to upset you. I will re-read the paper and go
> through atomspace-cog and the original atomspace.
>
> Again sorry for misleading the conversation.
>
Urk, I'm not upset. it's just ... well, there are actually many important
and subtle design decisions in all of this, and, in a certain sense, the
AtomSpace actually gets many of them wrong. However, getting them right is
(extremely?) difficult, and I keep hoping for, waiting for a discussion
that sheds light onto the actual issues, and actually focuses on the
problematic design areas.
I should be the one to apologize; I get excited and like to shout and get
very demonstrative when .. certain things excite me. This ... doesn't go
over well, socially.
--linas
--
Verbogeny is one of the pleasurettes of a creatific thinkerizer.
--Peter da Silva
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAHrUA34Hg1Sv%3DVAGo4D%2BnzmsawgihiW0WDrRjBb_pNs7dhaOBg%40mail.gmail.com.
