Yeah actually OpenCog's PLN logic can be viewed as a kind of
paraconsistent logic, I have a plan to write up a paper on this when I
get time.  Basically when you have evidence for two conflicting
possible truth values for a relationship, you can view this from a
paraconsistent-logic view, as the relationship being (provisionally at
least) partly true and partly false, i.e. both true and false to
different degrees

Paraconsistency of a logic maps via Curry-Howard correspondence into
gradual typing of a programming language, which is part of why we are
aiming to make Atomese 2 (a key part of Hyperon design) gradually
typed...

ben

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 3:29 PM Ivan V. <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thank you for an answer.
>
> I never thoroughly investigated it, but from what I know about it, 
> paraconsistent logic seems like it may be a good option to consider. I never 
> thought of it like putting it at the roots of deductive systems, but when I 
> look at it in that light, it certainly rings some inspirative bells.
>
> Thanks again,
> ivan v.
>
> pon, 26. lis 2020. u 15:33 Ben Goertzel <[email protected]> napisao je:
>>
>> Atomspace is more of a meta level framework that can be used to
>> implement different sorts of formal systems, including different
>> logics ... it does not enforce logical consistency and thus can
>> achieve logical completeness (given arbitrarily much resources)
>>
>> In OpenCog Hyperon we are aiming to formalize this aspect more
>> precisely using gradual typing and paraconsistent logic, but the
>> current Atomspace/Atomese achieves this simply by not requiring any
>> particular type system or associated set of restrictions on the
>> nodes/links...
>>
>> So basically, consistency and such exist on the level of particular
>> sets of node/link types with associated rules, not on the level of the
>> underlying infrastructure...
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:32 AM Ivan V. <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Does anyone have a general opinion on Gödel's incompleteness theorem? The 
>> > question that rises is: "Is Atomspace a consistent formation, or is it an 
>> > incomplete formation, assuming it is an embodiment of a kind of logical 
>> > system?"
>> >
>> > I ask this question because I suspect it is possible to define different 
>> > rule sets in URE, applying to different areas of knowledge contained 
>> > within AGI's memory, thus overcoming limitations of Gödel's incompleteness 
>> > proof of a logical system while retaining overall knowledge relative 
>> > consistency.
>> >
>> > Does OpenCog support this kind of rule divergence?
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> > "opencog" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> > email to [email protected].
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAB5%3Dj6XvNt5yaXcpkTQXjFmpfxTaV_KxFFozHyJx5BnbuojHyg%40mail.gmail.com.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ben Goertzel, PhD
>> http://goertzel.org
>>
>> “Words exist because of meaning; once you've got the meaning you can
>> forget the words.  How can we build an AGI who will forget words so I
>> can have a word with him?” -- Zhuangzhi++
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "opencog" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBdtVXHFNhsbYSJGjkzxGLZgapNQkhBq7JhO4_Y7YpOBHw%40mail.gmail.com.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "opencog" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAB5%3Dj6Whj%2B4DeLVbJX2FYj44k%2BNvcZx_Cx8bCRW0X_Ym9_%2B2gg%40mail.gmail.com.



-- 
Ben Goertzel, PhD
http://goertzel.org

“Words exist because of meaning; once you've got the meaning you can
forget the words.  How can we build an AGI who will forget words so I
can have a word with him?” -- Zhuangzhi++

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBfmmdaF%3DzEFJJd_aCJpmT2Et%3DOVvXnPHj_2GmfYttTZCA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to