> Sorry, the question was not whether or not AtomSpace is used for each project > independently. (thank you for the detailed answer though) It was meant to > ask if multiple projects use AtomSpace as a blackboard in order to > interoperate.
They don't at the moment, in practice. For this to work, one would need a common ontology across the multiple projects. The ontology implicit in the built-in set of Atom types is generally too low-level to admit practical unification of multiple applied Atomspace projects. In our AI-DSL project at SNet (which does not use Atomspace at present, but probably will in future when we shift it from Idris2 to MeTTa as a base language), we are using SUMO as a base ontology for a similar purpose One would then need to e.g. map the ontology used in the current OpenCog Bio-Atomspace into SUMO (which would not be so hard) I have been discussing w/ Josef Urban (who is collaborating with Adam Pease the SUMO dude) some projects using neural models to automatically map NLP expressions into SUMO interpretations. This would be a narrow AI project obviously not AGI, but could be useful as a tool supporting some sorts of AGI dev... -- Ben -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBeuyYE0YFQ5e%2B-rsmwe2r%3Da18pe0uJTgvv-wKUT7Qo3Sw%40mail.gmail.com.
