Alas, I attached a PDF that contains errors, instead of a URL to a PDF where the latest and greatest version can be found. So -- a mistake is fixed, and additional clarification is provided. The presentation is now much stronger. Here: https://github.com/opencog/atomspace/raw/master/opencog/sheaf/docs/ccg.pdf
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 1:13 PM Linas Vepstas <[email protected]> wrote: > The relationship between different grammar formalisms is almost always > cloudy and opaque. Sometimes, it's how the grammar is formalized, > sometimes, it's the notation. > > In the case of Combinatory Categorial Grammar, it's the notation. After a > minor, almost trivial restructuring of the notation, it can be seen to be > equivalent to Link Grammar. See attached PDF. > > Thanks to Adam Vandervorst, who raised this in an OpenCog Discord chat > discussion. I've long known of this equivalence, having sensed it by > gut-feel. However, having to actually write it out, in detail, to make it > convincing to others, was ... educational. > > -- Linas > > -- > Patrick: Are they laughing at us? > Sponge Bob: No, Patrick, they are laughing next to us. > > > -- Patrick: Are they laughing at us? Sponge Bob: No, Patrick, they are laughing next to us. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAHrUA36QWsN1j-apJsZL9w4EEqb5CZFLwoXbsW%3DAc11oO3pZ-w%40mail.gmail.com.
