*Ankur Arora Murder Case* is a 2013 Indian Hindi medical thriller film 
directed by Suhail Tatari and written and produced by Vikram Bhatt. The 
film stars Arjun Mathur, Tisca Chopra, Kay Kay Menon, Paoli Dam. The film 
takes up an urgent and disturbing issue of death during surgery and is 
based on a real-life incident where a boy dies on the operation table due 
to medical negligence.[3] The shooting of the film started after nearly one 
year of research and similarities to real life are in this case, not 
coincidental.[4]The movie released on 14 June 2013 and made a profit of 2.5 
Crores approximately. It was declared semi hit.

Dr. Romesh Sharma is a young medical intern who dares to dream. He is in 
awe of Dr. Viren. Asthana, the Chief Surgeon of the Shekhawat General 
Hospital. All he wants is to be like him. He lives with Dr. Riya 
Srivastava, his co-intern and the love of his life.

Together with Ankur's mother Nandita Arora, Nandita's friend Ajay Shetty, 
their lawyer Kajori Sen, Dr. Romesh sets out on a turbulent journey to 
fight for what is right. A fight for justice against his mentor, the 
hospital and the love of his life who is initially against him for the fear 
of ruining her career and future. It is revealed that Kajori is in a 
relationship with her opposing lawyer who tells her to keep the case 
hanging and only blame the hospital overall, not Dr Asthana specifically. 
She does the same in the court but soon finds that she is pregnant with his 
child. As she informs him, he orders her to abort the baby. Romesh spots 
them together and with Nandita he goes to her house, only to find her lying 
ill due the abortion pill. They take her to the hospital and she promises 
them that she will fight for Ankur. Turns out, that all the necessary 
evidence against Dr. Viren Asthana is destroyed or literally snatched. Dr. 
Riya, who witnesses the operation, and Rosina D'Costa (Khushboo Kamal), a 
ward nurse in the hospital who had informed Dr. Asthana about Ankur eating 
some biscuits before the operation, also lie in court. The next day Riya 
goes to Dr Viren Asthana to sign for leave, she tells him that she lied, 
cheated with the credibility of her profession and her self respect is 
questioning her. A heated argument between her and Dr Asthana follows in 
which Dr asthana labels himself to be the god who should be forgiven for 
the mistake he has done. It is revealed in the hospital the next day that 
Riya had actually Shot the confession outburst by Dr. Viren Asthana on her 
mobile and presented it to the court. The case ends upon their favour and 
Dr Viren Asthana gets arrested. In the last scene, Romesh and Riya reunite 
and Nandita is shown remembering her memories with Ankur.

The movie received mixed reviews. Subhash K. Jha gave the movie 4 stars and 
said, "Indeed The Ankur Arora Murder Case is a far cleverer, wiser and 
relevant film than most of what we get to see these days. Bursting at the 
seams with acting talent director Suhail Tatari's restorative drama hits us 
where it hurts the most. The conscience."[6] Meena Iyer of Times of India 
gave it 3.5 stars. "Tatari is a winner in his choice of a subject. The 
story that has been researched from a true life incident does provide 
meaningful insights about the medical fraternity and facilities. However 
while the film is an eye-opener on medical skullduggery, it fails to become 
cutting edge cinema because the screenplay-offers few surprises." said 
ToI.[7] Shubhra Gupta of Indian Express said "Pity because this could have 
been a medico-legal thriller with teeth." and gave it 2 star.[8] Tushar 
Joshi of Daily News and Analysis gave it 2 stars. "The film engages you in 
the beginning but loses steam because of a its weak execution." wrote 
Tushar Joshi.[9] NDTV Movies gave it a rating of 2.5.[10] Taran Adarsh of 
Bollywood Hungama gave it 3 stars.[11]

The Ankur Arora Murder Case which has been billed as a medical thriller 
based on a 'true story' isn't actually that and is according to one 
reviewer a rather bad remake of the Paul Newman-starrer The Verdict. The 
reviews suggest that it's a movie about the death of a young patient caused 
due to medical negligence and the victim's mother's quest to find justice 
for her son.

It has Kay Kay Menon starring as the reputed surgeon Dr Asthana who goofs 
up by operating on his patient suffering from appendicitis even though the 
patient's stomach wasn't empty. This particular scene where it's implied 
that the child had eaten a few biscuits from a well-known biscuit brand 
which sued Vikram Bhatt's ASA production Pvt Ltd for infringement of 
copyright and also for displaying their product in bad light. Bhatt's camp 
responded by claiming that biscuit lying next to the boy doesn't constitute 
infringement, that the boy dies due to medical negligence and the company's 
allegations were unfounded.

Anyway legal hassles in the real world aside, the film mainly deals with 
legal tangles in the reel world when the child's mother takes the doctor to 
court for medical negligence. The film throws up two interesting medical 
questions: Also Read 
   
   Living Eel Measuring 12-Inches Found And Surgically Removed From 
   Vietnamese Man's AbdomenKate Middleton Reveals She Has Cancer: A 
   Timeline Of Her Abdominal Surgery, RecoveryAfter Experiencing Severe 
   Pain For 8 Years, 30-Yr-Old Gets A New Hip

More News

The most common danger of having food in the stomach during a surgery is 
aspiration (when the food in the stomach is thrown up while the patient is 
unconscious and paralysed due to the anaesthetic). It then enters the wind 
pipe and enters the lungs causing suffocation which can lead to pneumonia 
or death.

According to a Hospital Administrator, if doctors are aware of a patient's 
condition and do not cancel the surgery then it is considered negligent on 
the part of the doctor. By law it's the doc's responsibility to ask the 
patient they've eaten anything, whether they suffer from any allergies and 
most surgeries get cancelled due to these reasons.

"Ankur Arora Murder Case" is a medical thriller film based on a real-life 
incident where an eight-year-old boy dies due to medical negligence in a 
hospital. The low-budget film doesn't feature any big star cast.

*Subhash K. Jha of IANS writes*: "The 'Ankur Arora Murder Case' is one of 
the most gripping moral dramas in recent times. The deftly crafted script 
raises the question of right and wrong in the medical profession without 
getting peachy or hysterical. Somewhere, Dr. Asthana's medical arrogance 
connects with each one of us who has in one way or another encountered 
deadends in healthcare.

"Many portions of the pacy plot would seem excessively racy. The 
post-interval helping seems specially eager to seek out unexpected twists 
and turns. And that's fine. The idea of making a film on medical ethics is 
to ensure that audiences' participation in the proceedings never flags. To 
that extent, director Suhail Tatari (who earlier directed the gripping 
thriller 'My Wife's Murder'), keeps the large array of conflicted 
characters in a constant state of self-questioning anxiety. It's 
cinematically a terrific space to be in. Tatari explores that space with 
intelligence, sensitivity and some charm.

"The performances in both the first-half (the medical drama) and the 
second-half (the courtroom conflict) are all supremely poised. The actors 
assume brilliancy without getting compromised by the need to shine. Tisca 
Arora's bereaved mother's act is so real and restrained! She gives us 
goosebumps when after her son's death, she gets busy on her smartphone to 
fob off the terrible reality of the tragedy.

"Indeed, this is is a far cleverer, wiser and relevant film than most of 
what we get to see these days. At a time when Bollywood is raining bubbles 
and effervescence about 'jawaani deewanis' and 'yamla paglas', this 
sobering clenched disturbing medical thriller comes as an invigorating 
cloudburst."

*Saibal Chatterjee of NDTV writes*: "It is a well-meaning, proficiently 
crafted and competently acted drama about the wages of medical 
skullduggery. But Ankur Arora Murder Case fails to make a strong enough 
case for itself.

"The film's lack of vitality stems from factors that are embedded in the 
comatose screenplay, which has neither much sting nor any imagination. For 
one, the title is a dead giveaway, as a result of which one large chunk of 
the film is completely predictable. The audience knows a death is on the 
way and that it is going to lead to a 'murder case'.

"The first half plays out largely in an upscale medical facility; the 
second unfolds in a rather sterile courtroom where two lawyers who share 
more than just a profession square off against each other in what turns out 
to be a dreary legal contest.

"The script follows a simple logic: if it's a woman, she must be a real 
tough nut. The problem with Ankur Arora Murder Case is that promises much 
but delivers little. The manner in which director Suhail Tatari handles the 
narrative is commendably earnest up to a point. He proffers no cheap 
thrills.

"The script, too, sticks to its primary concern and eschews formula-ridden 
set pieces. The film also throws in plenty of medical procedures and 
terminology, suggesting that a great deal of homework has been done."

*Taran Adarsh of Bollywood Hungama writes*: "After attempting erotic 
thrillers and murder mysteries, Vikram Bhatt delves into the realistic zone 
with ANKUR ARORA MURDER CASE, which tackles the issue of medical neglect. 
Besides, this film goes beyond the issue of medical negligence. What 
happens when justice is denied to the victim's family? Vikram and director 
Suhail Tatari take the spectator from inside the operation theatre to a 
courtroom, where an eminent surgeon is tried for medical recklessness.

"Reportedly based on a true incident, ANKUR ARORA MURDER CASE focuses not 
just on the negligence in the operation theatre, but also throws light on 
the justice mechanism in our country. Come to think of it, a film like 
ANKUR ARORA MURDER CASE acts as wake up call for many a doctor or those 
associated with this profession/medical lobbies, besides making the 
spectator cognizant of the fact that we ought to have a dedicated procedure 
for speedy disposal of such cases.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/f8ced598-dddd-430a-ac04-42f70c975782n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to