Hi Craig,
At first, I thought there was already working code + specs that you could contribute to the open given you¹d been working on it for 6 months, but it sounds like it is at basically a concept phase. Given that, can you also add OpenNetLinux folks (Rob/Jeff) to the list of parties to understand what they have so far as they already have experience with it and already have working code there? Also, not clear how much we need in addition to this in terms of a big framework/etcŠ my impression was that OCP testing efforts needs something asap, and hopefully that can happen sooner than later. If there is a need for a larger ³architecture² then let¹s present that to the community. Finally, hope we can iterate on this out in the open and let it take shape with the community - no need to bake a complete plan/architecture offlineŠ :) Hopefully you all can get together, figure out some high-level ideas and then iterate with everyone. Thanks! Omar On 10/15/15, 1:30 PM, "opencompute-networking-boun...@lists.opencompute.org on behalf of Craig Thompson" <opencompute-networking-boun...@lists.opencompute.org on behalf of craig.thomp...@finisar.com> wrote: >I think Pete understates the effort that has been put into this so far. >Some code has been written and we're in the early stages of API >definition with Accton and Broadcom. The thought was to put more meat >around this before bringing it to OCP. However the level of interest has >accelerated our plans. > >The next step would be to bring all this together in a common spec. > >I suggest that the 3 parties (Finisar, Accton, Broadcom) come back to the >reflector with an initial proposal, scope of work and next steps. > >I'll take this offline for now and will be back shortly. > >Craig _______________________________________________ opencompute-networking mailing list Unsubscribe: http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/options/opencompute-networking opencompute-networking@lists.opencompute.org http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/listinfo/opencompute-networking
