Carlos

Thanks for taking the time to go through the specification proposal in detail 
and share your feedback.

Regarding your comments:
* Would it be possible to take the CWDM4 spec and update it with the CWDM4-lite 
specific information so it's all in one document?
Response: We thought about this and it does sounds like a great idea, but has 
not been workable in practice.
As an example of this, I point to the recent multi source agreement (MSA) which 
added 10km as a new link distance at 100G on CWDM wavelengths. This was not 
added into the CWDM4 spec as an additional reach, but was created as a separate 
new MSA called 4WDM (http://4wdm-msa.org/). Rather than creating yet another 
new MSA, we see the OCP Networking group as the best forum to share the relaxed 
specification.  And to share details of the ecosystem of networking elements 
that work together.  The idea is to help simplify deployment of 100G technology 
across data centers of all sizes and OCP seems the right place to do that.

*What is the difference between CWDM4-lite and PSM4 and why is another short 
distance, single mode fiber spec warranted?
Response: Both CWDM4-OCP and PSM4 target short reach data center links at 
<500m.  The difference between them is the number of fiber strands and 
connections required to complete a link.  A bi-directional link using CWDM4-OCP 
runs over 2 single-mode fibers, whereas PSM4 runs over 8 strands of fiber. PSM4 
requires 4 times as much fiber and 4 times as many patch-panel connections in 
each link which burdens data center infrastructure with additional cost and 
complexity, given the similarity in cost between the optical transceivers.

Katharine



 From: opencompute-networking 
[mailto:opencompute-networking-boun...@lists.opencompute.org] On Behalf Of 
Carlos Cardenas
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 11:38 AM
To: opencompute-networking@lists.opencompute.org
Subject: [Opencompute-networking] CWDM4-lite questions

Howdy Katharine.

Thanks for presenting this a couple of weeks ago.

Here's the following feedback I have:

* From this spec on CWDM4-lite 
(http://files.opencompute.org/oc/public.php?service=files&t=8ee8934b1f1f57bec2f88f2fac804d03<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__files.opencompute.org_oc_public.php-3Fservice-3Dfiles-26t-3D8ee8934b1f1f57bec2f88f2fac804d03&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=i8c1XOsbULQg4wxarudoiw&m=cbKc6LbuDDMDE_o6H_r0nt639m7I9AI0FVkFI4Sa6Q0&s=o9YeLFeJXJ3GINwkbMkhaaCEiWAxmvxBUlT11Eu3foI&e=>),
 I've spent more time reading the CWDM4 spec 
(http://www.cwdm4-msa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/CWDM4-MSA-Technical-Spec-1p1-1.pdf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cwdm4-2Dmsa.org_wp-2Dcontent_uploads_2015_12_CWDM4-2DMSA-2DTechnical-2DSpec-2D1p1-2D1.pdf&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=i8c1XOsbULQg4wxarudoiw&m=cbKc6LbuDDMDE_o6H_r0nt639m7I9AI0FVkFI4Sa6Q0&s=noqMkI87Ln-bvKPvuZvvgm2fI83VWz8NmR-ly9W8nEA&e=>)
 to really understand what's going on.  Would it be possible to take the CWDM4 
spec and update it with the CWDM4-lite specific information so it's all in one 
document?  As it is today, it feels too much like an errata than a 
specification.

* I understand the motiviation on wanting to do CWDM4-lite (same as LR4-lite 
and LR4-lite-lite).  However, for doing single mode fiber for short (500m) 
distances, there's already a spec and MSA for that: PSM4 
(http://psm4.org/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__psm4.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=i8c1XOsbULQg4wxarudoiw&m=cbKc6LbuDDMDE_o6H_r0nt639m7I9AI0FVkFI4Sa6Q0&s=rikOSkLssGbsPYagRkNlsVOSAPKnRKLAVJAJM9nYFw8&e=>).
  It's even the spec that folks of FB's size wanting single mode in the data 
center have deployed with others adopting it as well.  What is the difference 
between CWDM4-lite and PSM4 and why is another short distance, single mode 
fiber spec warranted?

Thanks in advance.

+--+
Carlos
_______________________________________________
opencompute-networking mailing list
Unsubscribe: http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/options/opencompute-networking

opencompute-networking@lists.opencompute.org
http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/listinfo/opencompute-networking

Reply via email to