On 7 jan 2011, at 14.32, Sion Lloyd wrote:
> libhsm.h contains the following line:
>
> #define HSM_MAX_SESSIONS 10
>
> Which probably goes some way to explaining it. I'm not sure that this can
> just
> be raised though as:
>
> 1) I don't know why it is set to 10 in the first place
"more than 10 HSM:s will be enough for everyone" ;-)
> 2) There may be some assumptions that it is 10 in other places. (I know that
> there shouldn't be, but I have not checked for it.)
I do not believe so and I see no problem bumping this to something considerable
higher - would 1000 be enough as a start (i.e., before we make this more
dynamic)?
jakob
--
Jakob Schlyter
Kirei AB - www.kirei.se
_______________________________________________
Opendnssec-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user
