I like the idea of the separate package, just like softhsm. Carlos
Sent from my iPad On Nov 30, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote: > Split it out to separate package or drop it. The less dependencies the > (core) OpenDNSSEC will have, the better. > > But keep the hooks to run zone checks before pushing it out. > > O. > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 14:39, Jakob Schlyter <[email protected]> wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> Due to the inability to operate together with upcoming Signer Engine >> features like IXFR, we're considering removing the Auditor from future >> versions of OpenDNSSEC. Other reasons for this is that we believe that the >> Auditor has played is part in the OpenDNSSEC development process, it now >> often introduces more problems for our users than helping and there are now >> multiple alternative zone checkers available. >> >> We now solicit user input on this plan from users activly using the Auditor >> (as opposed to just using it since it is enabled by default). Please submit >> your comments to the OpenDNSSEC users list >> ([email protected]) no later than December 2nd. >> >> jakob >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Opendnssec-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user >> > > > > -- > Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ > Opendnssec-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user _______________________________________________ Opendnssec-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user
