Hi Jake, Looks like a bug. Could you please report this to http://issues.opendnssec.org ( https://wiki.opendnssec.org/display/DOCS/Reporting+bugs ) and include all versions, OS info, logs and such. Also if you can run it with Verbosity 6 and include those log it will help.
Cheers, Jerry /Jerry On 26 okt 2012, at 17:03, elsif <[email protected]> wrote: > Unsigned zone: > lac-megantic.qc.ca. IN NS ns1.com2media.ca. > IN NS ns2.com2media.ca. > ville.lac-megantic.qc.ca. IN NS ns1.com2media.ca. > IN NS ns2.com2media.ca. > > Signed zone (ODS): > lac-megantic.qc.ca. 86400 IN NS ns1.com2media.ca. > lac-megantic.qc.ca. 86400 IN NS ns2.com2media.ca. > > > Signed zone (BIND): > lac-megantic.qc.ca. 86400 IN NS ns1.com2media.ca. > 86400 IN NS ns2.com2media.ca. > ville.lac-megantic.qc.ca. 86400 IN NS ns1.com2media.ca. > 86400 IN NS ns2.com2media.ca. > > It appears ODS is ignoring the 4th level when the 3rd level exists > (presumably this behaviour would be different if the NS RRset differs, but > I've yet to confirm that). > > I didn't expect zones to disappear from the signed zone, in any case, and > makes our post-signing validation checks fail. > > Can this be considered a bug? > > Thanks, > > -Jake > > _______________________________________________ > Opendnssec-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user _______________________________________________ Opendnssec-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user
