Hey,

>> I was to do it again I would take a look at p11-kit. There was talk of
>> p11-kit working around the problem.
>> 
>> http://lists.nominet.org.uk/pipermail/opendnssec-user/2011-April/001162.html
> 
> Hi Casper!
> 
> Thanks for the reference. I looked at the p11-kit, but this is rather 
> undocumented. I failed using it.
> 
> Anybody had success in using p11-kit to proxy the HSM?

p11-kit has 0.x version numbers, and it shows.

I just had to compile it under GnuTLS today, and it caused quite some 
ill-documented trouble.  In the end, I had to do an awkward "export 
PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/lib/.../pkgconfig/" to get it working.  I am not sure 
where the fault lies, with GnuTLS or p11-kit.  I had initially tried compiling 
p11-kit from source, but it did not come with a ./configure so I had to build 
that, leading to a chain of dependencies that were hard to meet on my target 
platform without diving deeper and deeper.

If you want to live on the edge, you may want to go with p11-kit.  If not, you 
might want to wait until it reaches 1.0 and is more friendly to build on 
various platforms, notably through ./configure scripts in tarballs.  If you 
don't want users to download and compile your software from source… then this 
is how to discourage them.

These are coloured findings, I know; I had a nasty afternoon ;-)  Be sure to 
counter me if you have had better experiences!

Cheers,
 -Rick_______________________________________________
Opendnssec-user mailing list
Opendnssec-user@lists.opendnssec.org
https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user

Reply via email to