> Looking at the code (shared/hsm.c), it looks like hsm_find_key_by_id() > returns NULL, but libhsm does not provide an error. After a couple of > tries, the signer reports "key not found". >
Could it be related to: https://issues.opendnssec.org/browse/SOFTHSM-45 Most of the code in SoftHSM had protection against a busy database. But there were examples where it wasn't. E.g. when opening the library at the same time there was a lot of key generation. // Rickard
_______________________________________________ Opendnssec-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user
