Hi, Maybe not yet available in all distributions, but you might want to go with OpenDNSSEC 1.4.10 that includes many important bug fixes.
— Benno > On 17 May 2016, at 11:27, Arun Natarajan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion. > > On 15 May 2016 at 13:13, Emil Natan <[email protected]> wrote: > As a rule of a thumb (for me at least), if DNS/DNSSEC is your core business > go for the source and building the software by yourself. You would like finer > control over build and features. Otherwise stick with whatever provided by > the OS. > > ena > > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Arun N S <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Any recommendation for the opendnssec / softhsm installation candidates for > production? Should we stick with the OS shipped version > softhsm-2.0.0rc1-3.el7.x86_64, opendnssec-1.4.7-3.el7.x86_64 (incase of > Redhat 7) or compile and install the latest stable from opendnssec.org? > > thanks, > > -- > arun > > _______________________________________________ > Opendnssec-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user > > > > _______________________________________________ > Opendnssec-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user -- Benno J. Overeinder NLnet Labs http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/ _______________________________________________ Opendnssec-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user
