On 09/15/2016 12:04 AM, Havard Eidnes wrote: >> stack trace: >> >> Core was generated by `ods-signerd'. >> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. >> #0 0x000000000042a45a in netio_dispatch () >> (gdb) where >> #0 0x000000000042a45a in netio_dispatch () >> #1 0x000000000040df3e in xfrhandler_start () >> #2 0x000000000040e26e in xfrhandler_thread_start () >> #3 0x00007f7ff560b3ae in ?? () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1 >> #4 0x00007f7ff6075e90 in ___lwp_park50 () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12 >> #5 0x00007f7ff4400000 in ?? () >> #6 0x00007f7ff7ff14c0 in ?? () >> #7 0x0000000111110001 in ?? () >> #8 0x0000000033330003 in ?? () >> #9 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () >> (gdb) >> (gdb) x/i netio_dispatch >> 0x42a383 <netio_dispatch>: push %r15 >> (gdb) > > With debug symbols: > > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. > #0 netio_dispatch (netio=0x7f7ff7b2a0c0, timeout=<optimized out>, > sigmask=0x0) > at wire/netio.c:250 > 250 relative.tv_sec = handler->timeout->tv_sec; > (gdb) p handler > $1 = (netio_handler_type *) 0x7f7fe300b2b8 > (gdb) p $->timeout > $2 = (struct timespec *) 0x7522203031203031 > (gdb) p handler->timeout->tv_sec > Cannot access memory at address 0x7522203031203031 > (gdb) where > #0 netio_dispatch (netio=0x7f7ff7b2a0c0, timeout=<optimized out>, > sigmask=0x0) > at wire/netio.c:250 > #1 0x000000000040df3e in xfrhandler_start (xfrhandler=0x7f7ff7b76090) > at daemon/xfrhandler.c:133 > #2 0x000000000040e26e in xfrhandler_thread_start (arg=<optimized out>) > at daemon/engine.c:255 > #3 0x00007f7ff560b3ae in ?? () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1 > #4 0x00007f7ff6075e90 in ___lwp_park50 () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12 > #5 0x00007f7ff4400000 in ?? () > #6 0x00007f7ff7ff14c0 in ?? () > #7 0x0000000111110001 in ?? () > #8 0x0000000033330003 in ?? () > #9 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () > (gdb) > > Looks like either "use after free" or "someone scribbled > somewhere they should not".
Thank you for reporting it. I suspect this might be a problem that the signer still is busy with a transfer, or wants to do a transfer for a zone that is no longer there. I've filed an issue for it: OPENDNSSEC-838 so that we can look into it. With kind regards, Berry van Halderen > Regards, > > - Håvard > _______________________________________________ > Opendnssec-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user > _______________________________________________ Opendnssec-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user
