Forgive me, you're right, I was on an older version, upgrading it fixed it. Thanks for your help everyone.
Best regards, Bruno Ortega Blanes > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Ubbink <stefan.ubb...@sidn.nl> > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2024 3:59 AM > To: Bruno Blanes via Opendnssec-user <opendnssec- > u...@lists.opendnssec.org> > Cc: Bruno Blanes <bruno.bla...@outlook.com>; Abdulkareem H. Ali > <kareem....@centralnic.com>; Antonio Prado <anto...@prado.it> > Subject: Re: [Opendnssec-user] Adhering to RFC 9276 Sec. 3.1 > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 17:44:13 +0000 > Bruno Blanes via Opendnssec-user <opendnssec-user@lists.opendnssec.org> > wrote: > > Hello Bruno, > > > So resalt wasn't doing anything because the salt wasn't old enough, > > after purposefully changing the resalt period to make in run, it > > printed the following message on my logfile when using <Salt > > length="0"/>: > > > > [policy_resalt_task] policy default has an invalid salt length. Must > > be in range [0..255] > > Which version of OpenDNSSEC are you using? Because there has been a fix > for that issue in 2.1.11 [1]. So if you are not yet using that version or > higher, > please upgrade. > > [cut how to configure OpenDNSSEC to adhere to RFC 9276 sec. 3.1] > > [1] https://github.com/opendnssec/opendnssec/blob/2.1.14/NEWS#L29 > > > -- > Stefan Ubbink > DNS & Systems Engineer > Present: Mon, Tue, Wed, Fri > SIDN | Meander 501 | 6825 MD | ARNHEM | The Netherlands T +31 (0)26 352 > 55 00 https://www.sidn.nl _______________________________________________ Opendnssec-user mailing list Opendnssec-user@lists.opendnssec.org https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user
