"David L. Thompson" wrote:
>
> segg,
>
> I've checked this out with the headers that define sigaction and I
> believe that it may not be an error. Is there any way you can prove
> to me that it is? The header is strange to me i.e. int sigaction __P
> (...)
from /usr/include/stdio.h or /usr/include/libio.h
#ifndef
__P
#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__cplusplus) ||
defined(c_plusplus)
#define __P(args)
args
#else
#define __P(args)
()
#endif
#endif
/*!__P*/
in /usr/include/signal.h
extern int sigaction __P ((int __sig, __const struct sigaction *__act,
struct sigaction *__oact));
With Kernighan & Ritchie standard there is no prototype arguments,
we have then after the pre-processor:
extern int sigaction ();
With type checking, following the new standard:
extern int sigaction (int __sig, __const struct sigaction *__act,
struct sigaction *__oact);
and this is also confirm by the same function, 13 lignes before
and the previous patch, not resolving the comma from v 1.4 to v 1.5 by Peter
Daniel
Kirchner.
