Yep. I think its a good idea. Greg
David Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 12/22/99 11:45:34 AM Please respond to [email protected] To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Re: [opendx-dev] Name-space collisions For internal functions then, do you want them to be _dxf_function-name? I will fix the ones I just did if that's the case? David On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I noticed that some internal names have been changed to avoid conflicts > with name-space collisions - good idea. In one of the most painful > (painful as in tedious - my idea of true pain is tedium) episodes in DX > history, we went through and changed all externally visible function names > to have a _dxf prefix, and all externally visible data names to begin with > _dxd. Some separated the prefix from the names with an underscore, eg > _dxf_foo, while others didn't - eg. _dxffoo. Now in the intervening years > its not clear that we've been completely consistant, but we have tried to > be. I think it'd be a good idea to try to preserve this. > > Greg > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- David L. Thompson e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Montana/CS Department Missoula, MT 59812 Work Phone : (406)243-4793
