On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 05:41:01PM -0500, Rick Scott wrote:
> I just did a full cvs up and noticed a couple of issues......
> 
> $ cvs update
> M src/exec/dxmods/Makefile.am
> M src/uipp/dxuilib/Makefile.am
> M src/uipp/dxuilib/dxmac.txt
> M src/uipp/dxuilib/gifmac.txt
> M src/uipp/dxuilib/vrmlmac.txt
> $
> 
> The dxmods one has something to do with the order of the files so that bison
> gets to chew on them, and make the .h files before they are needed. The 
> dxuilib
> mods are because, I think, the *.txt files are actually generated, but are 
> also
> still in CVS. Not sure of the details, it's been a while.
> 
> I do, however, suggest that as many people as possible try a _complete_ build
> starting with a make maintainer-clean, and ending with a make distcheck.
> Problems often crop up after a maintainer-clean gets rid of some files that 
> are
> normally not necessary to update.
> 
> Also, has anyone had a chance to check out the new Options->Grid.... dialog
> with Motif??
> 
> 

I sent diffs for src/exec/dxmods/Makefile.am
and for src/exec/libdx/local.mk back in the first half of December.
I haven't seen these changes, and I can send them again if needed.
I don't have write access to the CVS tree, as far as I know.

I also ran into trouble the first time I successfully built the
uipp/java stuff -- the files
 src/uipp/java/server/server_DXServer.h and server_DXServerThread.h
wanted to be rebuilt for some reason (have looked but didn't find out why).
These are checked into the tree, and perhaps should not be.

I also had problems in the java area as I was getting all the configure
settings to find the various pieces needed to finish the build.
When one run of make made a successful call to javac or javah but
the next call failed, repeating the make would fail one step earlier
with a message that it was trying to write to an existing file.
I had to manually remove the partial results after each failed attempt
before I could continue.  I haven't looked at the Makefile in question,
but it probably just needs a few more "$(RM) $@"  lines.

Thanks,

        -- ddj

Reply via email to