I'm in. Any objections? BTW. I have a version that uses MS tools under the standard gnu build structure ready for checkin. In addition to making lots of code changes for MS, I did wrappers for the MS compilers etc. that make them compatible with the gnu tools, and have MSVC6 projects for everything. I think its a necessary step before checking in the true Windows version of the exec that doesn't require Exceed and supports the ActiveDX component stuff.
So. Are we go for 4.1.0? Greg "Suhaib M. Siddiqi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@opendx.watson.ibm.com on 03/14/2000 07:43:30 AM Please respond to [email protected] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[email protected]> cc: Subject: [opendx-dev] Which version number to use Are we going to declare 4.0.10 are 4.1.0? I am trying to get OpenDx binaries compiled by using Exceed XDK 6.2 and MSVC 6.0 out of door. MSVC compilation requires a lot of manual editings, if we are set on declaring 4.0.10 as 4.1.0 then I might bump the version number now, instead of redoing it again. After the release of Windows 2000 Microsoft SDK has a lot of new headers and it required a good amount of OpenDx 4.0.10 source patching. M$ is about to release MSVC 7.0 which would have a lot of Win64 releated library and header changes again. We would need to do a lot of patching again after MSVC 7.0 is released. It may make binaries unstable at that time. I prefer to see the DX version bumped now before we get into another cycle of unstable binaries due to changes in compilers and libraries. Suhaib
