You may add MSVC projects files in CVS. Maybe under Windows directory? Best would be to add these file in the respective driectory and the dx.dsw in dx (root). Sicne these are text files they should not affect other platforms.
I would prefer MSVC project files. Once users start using your MSVC wrappers, I am affraid mailing list might get flooded with questions. Suhaib > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2000 9:22 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [opendx-dev] rpm spec file > > > Sounds reasonable to me. What do y'all think about MSVC project > files? It > requires a file in the root and separate files in each C/C++ source leaf. > Isn't there a way to handle it as a separate module in CVS. > Should they be > distributed in the source tarball, or some other way? > > Greg > > "David L. Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@opendx.watson.ibm.com on > 05/20/2000 06:13:44 PM > > Please respond to [email protected] > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To: [email protected] > cc: > Subject: [opendx-dev] rpm spec file > > > > Oh dear benovalent dictator. Is it alright to add the rpm binary > distribution spec file to the root of the dx tree? Or would you > rather have it hosted on the web by OpenDX.org? > > David > -- > .................................................................. > ........... > > David L. Thompson The University of Montana > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Computer Science Department > http://www.cs.umt.edu/u/dthompsn Missoula, MT 59812 > Work Phone : (406)257-8530 > >
