Hi, On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, R. Lahaye wrote:
>But I still consider this as an ugly programming technique. >Every compiler will/should complain about this, because you may >lose information by converting a float into an int. > >You yourself may know it's alright, but people who see these >warnings coming by during compilation, may start wondering whether >things will go well. >So I would strongly suggest to add a cast into the CVS, to tell >the compiler that the conversion float->int is alright. Geeze Rob, I didn't mean for my response to sound rude! I also would prefer that all of the i's are dotten and t's are crossed in coding. And if I had cvs access I would help in doing so, but I don't. I just thought you were looking for other people's opinions on the viability of the code and if it would result in problems. Tom
