David Thompson wrote: > I don't have time to work on a fix for a compiler bug at this moment. If > you can find a way around it, I'll include it--otherwise we'll just have > to make the comment that gcc 3.1 or better will take a long time to > compile this file.
Fix is "to be patient". So far, I haven't been patient enough. With my 2.95.2 gcc compiler, it takes over an hour to compile this one troublesome file on my FreeBSD 800 MHz Intel PC. R.
