Dear  Lloyd,

Thank you very much for your good news.

I'd really appreciate if you tell me exact command to type to test/set
following...  I need to support the system by myself (no sysad), without
much clue...

Enlightened,
yosuke kumura


On Sun, 14 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> That machine should be plenty fast for the data set you have.  You should
> verify the following:
> 1.  Per process quotas enable you to take advantage of the available memory
> 2.  Ensure you have 2-3x paging space as physical memory
> 
> 
> 
> yosuke kimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@opendx.watson.ibm.com on
> 05/13/2000 12:12:11 AM
> 
> Please respond to [email protected]
> 
> Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> To:   [email protected]
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: [opendx-users] Where to spend money to make it faster?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Suhaib,
> 
> Thank you very much for your info.
> 
> However, my situation is that we already have a machine (RS6000), and we
> want to upgrade some hardware (or software if that is a bottle neck) to
> improve performance.  I took a look at nVIDA's site, and it seems like the
> chip runs only on Intel compatible CPU.  Are you aware of similar product
> which runs on RS6000?
> 
> Also, is 128MB of RAM for the one attached directly to CPU?  This is
> less than the RAM of our current system.  Does this mean memory is not
> that critical for visualization?  Our data file is typically tens of
> MB.  When we animate it, dx sometimes aborts saying that there is not
> enough memory, so we have to make the size of file smaller by selecting
> fewer number of data at each grid cell (our data is multi-valued, up to ~30
> variables).  This is another source of frustration.  Is there any
> recommendation for this as well?
> 
> 
> yosuke kimura
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 12 May 2000, Suhaib Siddiqi wrote:
> 
> > If you want to spend money and get  Linux box, you might consider
> > getting a PC with nVidia GeForce2 with 128 MB RAM.  nVidia provides
> > hardware accelerated OpenGL and kernel drivers for their GeForce family
> > cards.  The quality and performance of is excellent.
> >
> > Suhaib
> >
> > ----
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: yosuke kimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 18:09:09 -0500 (CDT)
> > Subject: [opendx-users] Where to spend money to make it faster?
> >
> > >
> > > Dear list members,
> > >
> > > I'd appreciate if you can share some experience with dx.
> > >
> > > We have IBM's RS/6000 43P Model 260 with 256MB RAM.  We use data
> > > explorer
> > > to <100 * <100 * <20 rectangular gridded scaler/2d-vector data.  We
> > > use
> > > 3-D isopleths the most.  Our problem is that when we use dx
> > > interactively,
> > > rendering takes long time.  So we want to figure out where to spend
> > > money
> > > to let the system respond more quickly.
> > >
> > > Our system has 256MB, and graphic card is POWER GXT120P (or 240?)
> > > Graphics
> > > Adapter.  We have OpenGL (is this a library or a hardware?), and OS
> > > is AIX
> > > 4.3.
> > >

-- 
yosuke kimura
Center for Energy and Environmental Resources
The Univ. of Texas at Austin, USA


Reply via email to