Try Rufus, they have many many versions in rpm format

http://rufus.w3.org/linux/RPM/IByName.html

Tom

On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>
> In addition to the www.imagemagick.org I also searched
> the web and did not find previous versions of it.
> I am about to join the imagemagick mailing list 
> and post a request for help.
>
> If you happen to come accross a 5.1 or 5.0 version
> I would appreciate any information.
>
> Thanks,
>
>--
>Valmor
>
>> 
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Valmor de
>> > Almeida
>> > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 7:53 PM
>> > To: Steve Ettorre
>> > Cc: [email protected]
>> > Subject: Re: [opendx-users] BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  Steve,
>> > 
>> >  Could you please tell us what version of ImageMagick
>> >  did you download? All I can find now is
>> >  version 5.2.2. With this, I get the exact same
>> >  error (dynamic link) you did in the past. I am trying to install 
>> >  opendx-4.1.0-1.i386.rpm under RH 6.1 (i686). 
>> >  Thanks for any help.
>> > 
>> > --
>> > Valmor de Almeida
>> > ORNL
>> > 
>> > 
>> > >To: [email protected] 
>> > >     Subject: Re: [opendx-users] BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER 
>> > >     From: Steve Ettorre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>> > >     Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 12:47:02 -0400 
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >To all:
>> > >
>> > >I got my dynamic linker problem fixed. I removed the ImageMagick 
>> > rpm package that
>> > >was installed on my machine. I then downloaded and installed the 
>> > gzipped tar file
>> > >from the ImageMagick web site. As soon as I did this, dx ran and 
>> > I was able to
>> > >view sample data files.
>> > >
>> > >Thanks for all your help and patience.
>> > >
>> > >-S.
>> > >
>> > >P.S. I have one additional question - I want to use dx to view 
>> > results from a CFD
>> > >code which currently outputs fieldview files. Does anyone know 
>> > of a converter
>> > >that might be available to translate fieldview files to a format 
>> > that dx will
>> > >accept?
>

Reply via email to