If that's the case, it might be appropriate (again depending on the journal, etc.) to indicate it in an Acknowledgements section of the paper rather than a formal reference. The latter might be relevant only if your paper utilizes, builds upon or is in contrast to DX-based techniques published elsewhere.
Debra Sue Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@opendx.watson.ibm.com on 02/05/2001 08:48:42 AM Please respond to [email protected] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Re: [opendx-users] citation > I suspect Debra meant "acknowledge" rather than "cite"? Do we/should we > have a standard text acknowledgement that would give OpenDX greater fame if > we use it consistently in publications? (Question is directed to the > opendx-board, I guess). Chris is right, I meant "acknowledge" or "reference", thinking perhaps I should list the OpenDX home page in the text or references section. -- Debra
