The Sequencer outputs integers that you can use whatever way you want. So,
consider this, as an example:
Sequencer -> n
|
Import file n
| |
Compute(real) Compute(imaginary)
| |
Glyph Glyph
| |
Render Render
| |
WriteImage WriteImage
If you use the same filename in WriteImage, the alternating glyph
renderings will be appended to each other. I would suggest that you use
consistent cameras and annotations to make the resultant animation useful.
FYI, I saw your posting the IM mailgroup and the response. This could be
done in an easier fashion, by putting each image in a separate file and
then assembling. To get that in DX, pass the output of Sequencer to two
Formats, one for each WriteImage filename. The template for each would be
something like "real_%02d" and "imag_%02d", respectively.
Kate White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@opendx.watson.ibm.com on
07/03/2001 03:32:11 AM
Please respond to [email protected]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: [opendx-users] combining sequences
Hello all,
I am trying to visualize vectors in complex data fields and I have some
questions about using the sequencer model. What I have done so far is
create a sequence of glyphs that model the imaginary parts of an electric
field and a sequence of glyphs that model the real parts of the field.
What I would like to do is combine the sequences (i.e. make one file which
alternates real 1, imag 1, real 2, imag 2, etc.) Is there a way to do
this in either opendx or image magick?
thanks,
kate white
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
