Greg is the one who assign version numbers when new sources are released. I think if we start changing version numbers because of different build, it might create another confusion.
How about naming the archives 4.1.3a, and 4.1.3b etc? Suhaib > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Pelkie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 8:30 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [opendx-users] Re: REPLACEMENT BINARIES FOR WINDOWS/NT ( > WASRE: [opendx-users] FI XED: Problem in Opendx for windows/nt - > Suha ib? > > >I uploaded opendx-4.1.3-WIN32-setup.zip to ftp.sdsc.edu for David > to provide > the new binaries through opendx.org. The Executive problem is > fixed. > > > Just a suggestion that in future, we bump the number, say to 4.1.4, > when doing rebuilds like this (that is, after posting the older > version), since many have already downloaded the bogus 4.1.3 so > things could get real confusin' out there. I know I've already got > support calls during the midst of the debugging frenzy. > > Chris Pelkie > Vice President/Scientific Visualization Producer > Conceptual Reality Presentations, Inc. > 30 West Meadow Drive > Ithaca, NY 14850 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
