I believe you want to use the "fuzz" attribute on the the ribbon to get it to be "on top" of the rest of the plot without actually making the thing 3D.
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 12:03, Sharon Gibson wrote: > Thanks anyway, but my plot is the same regardless of this trick (and the > ribbon > is still a surface). But in fooling with it, I discovered that my use of > Translate may have been the thing messing the axes up. I cut out any > translation in the z dimension, i.e. [.0001 .0001 0], and everything plots > fine. Without Translate, the Ribbon line does not appear, (but the axes are OK > !). > > --- Forwarded mail from [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [opendx-users] AutoAxes > To: [email protected] > From: "Lloyd A Treinish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 08:27:45 -0400 > Reply-To: [email protected] > > > Ribbon creates triangles in 3d even if the input data are 2d (a feature). > Its z-component is telling AutoAxes to do what you don't want. > > Try the following to remedy the situation: > > Ribbon > | > Remove(, "normals") > | > Mark (,"positions") > | > Compute ([a.x, a.y]) > | > Unmark > | > > > > > > Sharon Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@opendx.watson.ibm.com on 10/23/2001 > 03:19:53 PM > > Please respond to [email protected] > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To: [email protected] > cc: > Subject: [opendx-users] AutoAxes > > > > I am trying to display a colored field with 2-d positions in combination > with a > line created by the Ribbon macro, then framing the result using AutoAxes. > AutoAxes works fine on just the field or just the line, but when I combine > the > two items the axis tick marks jump from primary x and y (left/bottom) axes > to > secondary x and y (right/top). Also, the axes labels are now covered up by > the > ticks. > > I see that the line (Ribbon) is really a surface, and although it displays > OK, > I'm wondering if that somehow messes up the axes ? > > > > > > --- End of forwarded mail from [email protected]
