David,
> Can you set the color depth to another bit depth and see what
> happens. I bet there is something up with the number of color planes
> that is causing the problem.
YEP,
I changed the color depth from 16 bit to 24 bit, after I realized that your 
questions pointed into the direction that there may be something with the 
XServer. After changing OpenDX also tells me the color depth is 24 bit.  I 
could not believe that I could see the graph finally. The bad thing about it 
is that with my resolution I am only to able to go up to 60 Hz - which really 
gets on the eyes. I wonder how I could get the graph with 16 bit color depth. 
Why is there a difference in the results? Can I change something on the 
OpenDX Server, so my XServer does not have a problem anymore?

> The error you're getting with respect to GLX infers that you do not
> have GL (hardware rendering) capabilities. This may be due to the
> fact that OpenGL was not installed on your Sun and thus this option
> would not be available.
By checking ldd dxexec I saw that it is dynamically linked to libGL.so.
 ldd dxexec
        libjpeg.so.62 =>         /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.62
        libz.so.1 =>     /usr/lib/libz.so.1
        libnsl.so.1 =>   /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1
        libsocket.so.1 =>        /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1
        libXpm.so.4.11 =>        /usr/local/lib/libXpm.so.4.11
        libdl.so.1 =>    /usr/lib/libdl.so.1
        libm.so.1 =>     /usr/lib/libm.so.1
        libSM.so.6 =>    /usr/openwin/lib/libSM.so.6
        libICE.so.6 =>   /usr/openwin/lib/libICE.so.6
        libXm.so.4 =>    /usr/lib/libXm.so.4
        libXp.so.1 =>    /usr/openwin/lib/libXp.so.1
        libGL.so.1 =>    /usr/openwin/lib/libGL.so.1
        libXext.so.0 =>  /usr/openwin/lib/libXext.so.0
        libXt.so.4 =>    /usr/openwin/lib/libXt.so.4
        libX11.so.4 =>   /usr/openwin/lib/libX11.so.4
        libpthread.so.1 =>       /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1
        libgen.so.1 =>   /usr/lib/libgen.so.1
        libdga.so.1 =>   /usr/openwin/lib/libdga.so.1
        libXmu.so.4 =>   /usr/openwin/lib/libXmu.so.4
        libc.so.1 =>     /usr/lib/libc.so.1
        libmp.so.2 =>    /usr/lib/libmp.so.2
        libthread.so.1 =>        /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
        /usr/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire/lib/libc_psr.so.1
Now I know a solution but don't really understand the effects. Maybe I could 
go ahaed and get a new graphics board but I probably could end up in a 
similar situation. 

Deeply appreciating your help! Thank you very much!

Raphael

> David
>
> >David,
> >Thank you very much for pointing to the reference! Actually did I not even
> >trust calling myself "developer", therefore I was not looking to carefully
> >into that section.  Very nice description covering all that I needed
> >including the notes on the hdf install. Would probably be a nice idea to
> >include some of these information into the INSTALL file in the tarball.
> > Mine was simply "empty".  Even a simple link would mean a lot.
> >
> >>  As for why you wouldn't be able to view the image, what color depth
> >>  is the X server set at? In the ImageWindow, what Colordepth is
> >>  selected? Can you change it? Are you trying to render in hardware or
> >>  software?
> >
> >I got XFree 4.1 (xf86-4.1.0-45) on a SuSE 7.3 pro Linux box using Kernel
> >2.4.17. My graphics board is an ELSA  with 8 MB and an Permedia 2 Chip.
> >The XServer is set to a color depth of 16bit. In the OpenDX Frontend 16
> > bit is also checked. I can't change it in the OpenDX gui.
> >
> >I got two OpenDX installs. One is working just perfect on the local Linux
> >box. The other is on the SunFire 6800 Ultra-Sparc III. (750/900 Mhz). On
> > the local OpenDX install I can either render in software or hardware -
> > both work fine.
> >On the remote OpenDX install I can't render in hardware (The XServer is
> > still on my Linux box). If I try I get the error:
> >ERROR: Image: Display: Operation not implemented: GLX extension not
> > installed 11772: signal 11 caught
> >Abort
> >and another windows shows
> >Connection to server has been broken!
> >
> >Does this give any more hints? The people from the Computational Center
> > saw the same effects - but I don't know of their hardware. Is it possible
> > to get to any conclusion from these information?
> >
> >Raphael

Reply via email to