The first thing to try was the 7.3 binary rpm, which runs fine on my older
7.3 system...
I just thought I would ask before I do a rebuild with the new kernel, gcc,
etc.
Has anybody tried building DX with the Intel compiler?
Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lloyd A Treinish/Watson/IBM on
01/22/2003 05:22 PM ---------------------------
Nils Smeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@opendx.watson.ibm.com on 01/22/2003
05:06:08 PM
Please respond to [email protected]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: [opendx-users] 4.2 and RH8
Yes,
But I am not running the RPM version, and havn't tried that either.
I'm on a RH-8, AMD 2600+, with Nvidia GForce4 graphics and think
the performance is excellent. So do try a rebuilt version and see
if it improves things.
/Nils
---------------------- Forwarded by Lloyd A Treinish/Watson/IBM on
01/22/2003 05:22 PM ---------------------------
John Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@opendx.watson.ibm.com on 01/22/2003
04:56:32 PM
Please respond to [email protected]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Re: [opendx-users] 4.2 and RH8
Did you compile this on the machine that you are running it on? I have
found that most applications have to be recompiled on RH 8.0 using the
gcc3.0 libraries before they perform well. Is there a DX 4.2 binary that
was compiled on RH8/gcc3?
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Lloyd A Treinish wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I just tried the DX 4.2 binary for Linux on a fairly hefty RH8 system
(dual
> 2.0 Xeon, 2 GB RAM, FireGL4 graphics). It's surprisingly sluggish,
> including hardware rendering using the latest driver from ATI. In
> addition, some ui functions (e.g., ctrl-V or pulldown for view mode)
cause
> the UI to crash. Has anyone had much RH8 experience with DX or should I
> just try to make a new version?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
--
---------------------------------
John Harris
National Center for Ecological
Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS)
735 State St. Ste. 303
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
805-892-2531
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------
