Karl,

Much of the functionality you are looking for is available in a beta DX
application I have released (GeoMoVie;
http://www-wsm.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/pub/geomovie/WSM_GeoMoVie_v1.0b1.
zip). This is designed for visualizing stress data from finite element
results calculated for geological volumes. Much of the app deal with
plotting geologically specific data types (delta CFS etc.) however one
part of it maps the volumetric data onto arbitary (ie geological)
surfaces defined from meshed surfaces. Another part polts only the
surfaces which is what you are looking for. Off list I will send you a
small app, with most of the surface handling features, that I use to
verify the surfaces meshes and a demo file of the Rhine Graben (2MB).

With regards to data numbers. I have used FE meshes with 18 variables at
3-400k nodes sucessfully on 1GB XP machines so you may not need to
remove your attributes. Although if you only want the surfaces then this
will certainly help. 

Peter


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karl
Pohlmann
Sent: 09 October 2004 01:26
To: OpenDX-Users
Subject: [opendx-users] Visualizing subsurface geologic units


Hi,

Has anyone used DX to visualize 3-D subsurface geologic units, a la
EarthVision?  I've discretized a pretty detailed geologic model and
treated the array as connection-dependent so as to produce a volume of
colored cells for visualization.  However, this is very inefficient
because the array can easily be too large for DX to handle on my machine
(linux, Athlon, 1GB memory).  And I can't reduce the resolution of the
data set without losing important detail.

It seems that it would be much more efficient to convert each geologic 
unit (they are fairly continuous in space, i.e. mainly layers) to some 
sort of volume defined only by the geometry of its outer surfaces.  This

would eliminate all the interior data which are redundant anyway. 
Another alternative might be to simply use a "fence diagram"; that is, a

series of cross sectional slices oriented in several directions, but a 
lot of information would be lost using this approach.

Any comments and/or suggestions would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Karl Pohlmann


-- 
Karl Pohlmann
Associate Research Hydrogeologist
Division of Hydrologic Sciences
Desert Research Institute
755 East Flamingo Road, Las Vegas, NV  89119
Phone: 702-862-5485        Fax: 702-862-5427

_____________________________________
Dr Peter Connolly
World Stress Map
@ Geophysical Institute
University of Karlsruhe
Hertzstrasse 16
76185 Karlsruhe
Germany
tel +49 (0)721 6084593
fax +49 (0)721 71173
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http:\\www.world-stress-map.org  

Reply via email to