On Jul 25, 2007, at 12:38 AM, Stef Verlinden wrote: > I think I get your point. The answer could be that we only store the > 'hard' quality markers and then compute the data quality locally > according to the local criteria everytime we want to view the data. This makes sense. "hard quality markers" are determinants for the subjective interpretation. These locally interpreted "hard quality markers" end up in an annotation expressing the local belief at that point in time. GF -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070725/efe17ae2/attachment.html>
- Data quality questions/ propos... Dipak Kalra
- Data quality questions/ propos... Thomas Beale
- Data quality questions/ propos... Stef Verlinden
- Data quality questions/ propos... Stef Verlinden
- Data quality questions/ propos... Thomas Beale
- Data quality questions/ propos... Sam Heard
- Data quality questions/ propos... Stef Verlinden
- Data quality questions/ propos... Sam Heard
- Data quality questions/ propos... Stef Verlinden
- Data quality questions/ propos... Stef Verlinden
- Data quality questions/ propos... Gerard Freriks
- Data quality questions/ propos... Thomas Beale
- Data quality questions/ propos... Stef Verlinden
- Data quality questions/ propos... Thomas Beale
- Data quality questions/ propos... Sam Heard
- Data quality questions/ proposal Stef Verlinden
- USA: Summary Report on NHIN Prototype Architec... Seref Arikan
- Data quality questions/ proposal Dipak Kalra
- Data quality questions/ proposal Chunlan Ma
- Data quality questions/ proposal William E Hammond
- Data quality questions/ proposal Stef Verlinden
